No. The official FAQ preserves ordinary eligibility for permanent residence, admissibility, and EB-1 or EB-2 visa availability as separate conditions. The gift is one part of the described process, not a substitute for those legal requirements.
Identify the actual legal basis being relied on
Review the official instructions and the applicant's individual circumstances together rather than relying on promotional summaries. Confirm which underlying classification applies and identify any unresolved eligibility question, such as an admissibility issue, before assuming a financial commitment resolves it. An initial review yields an official-source snapshot bearing its retrieval date, a person-by-person eligibility and payment worksheet, and a list of records likely to be requested during vetting and later immigrant processing.
The official instructions and the applicant's own identity, history, and source-of-payment records settle the question; a third-party summary does not. Confirm the correct pathway, organize the underlying records, and recheck the terms immediately before any payment. Problems arise when a household treats the gift payment as a guaranteed immigration result, overlooks a family member's separate issue, or relies on a superseded fee statement.
The payment is neither a conventional visa purchase nor an investment purchase. For requirements, compare the official pathway with the applicant's own eligibility and admissibility record before considering a payment instruction. The decision is whether a known issue needs specialist assessment now, rather than discovering after payment that a separate condition remains unresolved.
Hypothetical example: A retired translation-agency owner is ready to pay but has an old immigration refusal; the applicant must assess that history before treating payment as the next step.