No. Investment capital should be kept separate from project administrative fees, government filing fees, legal and document-preparation costs, and later-stage immigration filings, and the actual agreements should be reviewed for what each fee covers.
Trace what each payment is meant to accomplish
Ask whether a fee is refundable and what happens to it if the project or the immigration case changes. Keep independent financial due diligence and any family-related costs visible as their own budget items rather than folded into a single advertised package price. A case can fail when a transfer lacks source evidence, project promises substitute for job proof, or conditional-residence duties are overlooked.
Trace each charge to its recipient and stated purpose. For costs, separate capital intended for the enterprise from administrative, legal, diligence, immigration, and family expenses. The decision is whether the household can sustain the complete financial exposure, including non-investment charges, without treating an advertised amount as the entire commitment.
Hypothetical example: A solar-equipment assembly venture advertises one investment amount; the family must list offering, legal, travel, and later condition-removal expenses before judging affordability.